Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dwyer v. Clerk of District Court for Scott County

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 15, 1987No. 86-389Published

1DissentReynoldson, Chief Justice

I cannot agree that the district court’s well-reasoned ruling, denying mandamus in these circumstances, should be overturned.

The rules we apply in these cases are summarized succinctly in 52 Am.Jur.2d Mandamus § 64, at 388 (1970):

To warrant the issuance of [a] writ [of mandamus], not only must there be a legal right in the relator, but, owing to the extraordinary and drastic character of mandamus and the caution exercised by courts in awarding it, it is also important that the right sought to be enforced be clear and certain. There must be an immediate right to have the act in question…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. WedelstedtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. Broyles v. Iowa Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. Ritter v. DagelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  4. In Re the Marriage of McMorrowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  5. State v. HalversonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API