Legal Opinion

Duplin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 1990No. W90-111PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY:

The trial court erred in denying the motion for summary judgment filed by Nautilus Insurance Company. There is no serious dispute of fact that relator’s insured, Mako’s bar, is engaged in the business of selling and serving alcoholic beverages. Opposing argument notwithstanding, any liability of Mako’s in the instant suit must necessarily stem from the fact that Mako’s is in the business of selling and serving alcohol. Exclusion (h) of relator’s policy issued to Mako’s excludes from coverage damages for which Mako’s is held liable as an organization engaged in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morrison on Behalf of Morrison v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frost v. DavidLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Norris v. GuthrieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Guidroz v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API