State v. Sedam
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J:
This case brings up the question of liability of a surety on a bail bond, where the bond was declared forfeited and then reinstated with new conditions with no notice of the changes given to the surety. We believe that the surety should at least have notice of any material changes made to an appearance bond in order to be held liable for later violations of the contract. Since there was no notice given to the surety here, we reverse and vacate the judgment of the trial court.
Appearance History
Billy F. Warfield was surety on the bail bond for Tyler W. Sedam when Sedam was charged with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. PraterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003
- First Nat'l Bank of Anthony v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
- State v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
- State v. BuckleCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
- State v. ChappellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. International Fidelity Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- State v. TWO JINN, INC.Idaho Court of Appeals · 2010