Legal Opinion

Sarasota County School Board v. Castagna

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 26, 1991No. 90-1597PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARFIELD, Judge.

The employer/servicing agent (ESA) appeal a workers’ compensation order finding that appellee claimant was injured in a compensable automobile accident. Claimant cross-appeals the ruling of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) that the ESA “will pay the unpaid medical bills adjusted to the Medical and Surgical Fee Schedules claimed and will be responsible for the provision of medical care which may be warranted by the claimant’s condition in the future.” We affirm the finding of com-pensability, but reverse that aspect of the order which limits the ESA’s responsibility only…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Travelers Ins. Co. v. SitkoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Greynolds Park Manor v. GeorgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Greynolds Park Manor v. GeorgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Popovich v. Overland TransportDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Kendall AssociatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Nova Southeastern University v. MajnerichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API