Legal Opinion

Joseph P. Grady and John B. Grady v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 20, 1958No. 14438PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

More than sixty days after the decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office rejecting the claims of their application for patent appellants filed a complaint in the District Court purporting to be pursuant to “Revised Statutes, Section 4915.” We construe this as intended to be under the successor statute, 35 U.S.C. § 145 (1952). The Commissioner moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter. The court dismissed the complaint pursuant to the motion and at the same time denied a motion of appellants for leave to…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Floyd E. Washington v. Dale C. Cameron, Superintendent, St. Elizabeth's HospitalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. Commissariat a L'EnErgiE Atomique v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  3. MacArthur Liquors, Inc. v. Palisades Citizens Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  4. Association for Preservation of Freedom of Choice, Inc. v. WadmondDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  5. Haine v. GoogeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API