United States v. Van Duzee
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT .OP THE UNITED STATES FOK THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. The opinion of the court in this case is reported ante, 169. The seventh paragraph of the opinion is as follows (p. 175): “ 7. Objection is also made to fees for entering orders for trial, and recording the verdict, in thirty-eight criminal cases,, the claim being that such services are- included in the fee-allowed ‘ for making dockets and indexes, issuing venire, taxing costs and all…
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT .OP THE UNITED STATES FOK THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. The opinion of the court in this case is reported ante, 169. The seventh paragraph of the opinion is as follows (p. 175): “ 7. Objection is also made to fees for entering orders for trial, and recording the verdict, in thirty-eight criminal cases,, the claim being that such services are- included in the fee-allowed ‘ for making dockets and indexes, issuing venire, taxing costs and all other services, on the trial or argument of a cause where issue is joined and testimony given, three dollars.’ The argument…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown
Upon a reconsideration of the seventh paragraph of our opinion in this case, we have come to the conclusion that the item for.entering the orders for trial, and recording the verdict should be allowed. We think the docket fee of three dollars was intended to cover the entry of the case upon the docket, indexing the same, making cotemporaneous minutes and entries upon the docket or calendar and such1 other incidental services as are not' covered by other clauses of the statute. Where, however, the entry is not a mere memorandum, but' requires to be made part of a permanent record, it is a…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Van Duzee v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1891
- Marsh v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1898
- Hallett v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1894
- United States v. ConverseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894