Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Saul

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided July 16, 2021No. 4:20-cv-00080Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NATHANIEL L. HURST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. 4:20-cv-00080-MTS ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI1 ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court for review of the final decision of Defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security, denying the application of Nathaniel L. Hurst (“Plaintiff”) for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. I. Procedural History On August 1, 2016, Plaintiff filed an application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. §§ 401

e…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Kacee Chandler v. Commissioner Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. Theresa Ramirez v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Social Security CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. William B. Johnson v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API