Legal Opinion

Funk v. Wingert

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 24, 1919PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from, the Circuit Court for Frederick County. (Worthington & Peter, JJ.) The-facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

This suit was on a promissory note dated May 27th, 1904, from Pomeroy Brothers & Ob., Henry F. Wingert, James A. Pomieroy and Edward L. Pomeroy to Louise M. Funk, payable sixty days after date.

The nwrr. was filed on the 29th day of March, 1918, by Louise M. Funk, by her Committee, Albert J. Long, against the makers of said note. To this narr. defendants pleaded:

First—That they never promised as alleged. Second'— That they never were indebted as alleged. Third—That the alleged cause of action did not accrue within three years before this suit. And several other pleas of lirojitation in various…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crook v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Keating v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Buxton v. BuxtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Piselli v. 75th Street MedicalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Decker v. FinkCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Johnson v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Emerson v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API