Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to District Court of Arapahoe County. The case is stated in the.opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtThatcher, C. J.

This was an action for the breach of a .covenant of seizin and of a covenant of right to convey inserted in a deed executed by the defendant to the plaintiff.

The declaration, after setting forth a description of the premises conveyed, avers that the defendant for himself, his heirs and personal representatives did covenant with the plaintiff, her heirs and assigns that he was well seized of the premises as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple and that he had good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Becker v. ArnfeldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  2. Wilson v. D., S. P. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  3. Wilson v. D., S. P. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API