Legal Opinion
Browne v. Connor
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided September 4, 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTiiaxter, J.
This is an action brought under the provisions of R. S. 1930, Chap. 26, Sec. 19, to recover damages for a nuisance as defined in Sec. 5 of said chapter as amended by P. L. 1933, Chap. 106, to wit, the obstruction by the defendants of a private way, the use of which was enjoyed by the plaintiffs. The case is before us on report on an agreed statement of facts.
The parties are the owners of land at Southport. The plaintiffs’ land, which is cultivated, is bounded on three sides by water and on the fourth side by land of the defendants. Pursuant to the provisions of R. S. 1930, Chap. 27, Sec. 16,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Laughlin v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
- Ulmer v. Lime Rock RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1904
- State v. PoulinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
- Denham v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Paine v. SavageSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Morris v. GossSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
- Franklin Property Trust v. Foresite, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Brown v. WarchalowskiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Warchalowski v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Town of Fayette v. ManterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.