Legal Opinion

Wise v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1982No. Appeal, No. 1766 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

In the instant case, the Claimant,1 seeks a remand because the referee failed to comply with Part VI of 34 Pa. Code §101.21(a) which requires the referee to give an unrepresented claimant certain instructions regarding his rights. In Katz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 59 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 427, 430 A.2d 354 (1981), we held that such an omission on the referee’s part required a remand. Our review of the record indicates that the referee did not give the Claimant the required instructions in this case.

The Commonwealth, however, argues that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Katz v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Colachino v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API