State Ex Rel. Baird v. Schroy
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
By Section 109 of the amended charter, the people of Akron protected persons holding positions pursuant to appointment from eligible lists and those who had been continuously in the service in the same position for three years preceding the effective date of the amendments. The appellant did not come within either of those requirements, and therefore the judgment of'the Court of Appeals should be, and is, affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Miles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Lynch v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- State, Ex Rel. v. Dept. of Hys.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
- State ex rel. Stein v. Department of HighwaysOhio Supreme Court · 1940