Legal Opinion
Boston Scientific Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 7, 2011No. 2010-1230, 2010-1231, 2010-1233, 2010-1234Published
1Opinion of the Court
647 F.3d 1353 (2011)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
JOHNSON & JOHNSON (also known as Johnson & Johnson, Inc.), Cordis Corporation, and Wyeth, Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 2010-1230, 2010-1231, 2010-1233, 2010-1234.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
June 7, 2011.
Matthew M. Wolf, Arnold & Porter LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief were Edward Han and John E. Nilsson.
David T. Pritikin, Sidley Austin LLP, of Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- The Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In Re Jack R. Wands, Vincent R. Zurawski, Jr., and Hubert J.P. SchoemakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.