Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hamby v. Haskins

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 29, 1982No. 81-241Published

1DissentDarrell Hickman, Justice

The facts and the law are equally significant in this case. Only an in-depth examination of both will reveal whether we have arrived at the right decision.

The appellee, Mrs. Haskins, was bitten by a dog at the rural residence of the appellant, Ron Hamby. She and her sister were in the vicinity of the appellant’s farm looking for a yard sale. They stopped at the appellant’s house to seek directions. They saw no vehicles nor anyone about the place. The appellee went to the door and, as she was returning to her vehicle, she said a “black and white dog” about the size of a collie bit her. They…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vangilder v. FaulkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Holt v. LeslieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. Field v. ViraldoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. Finley v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API