Legal Opinion

Hudson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 23, 1984No. 05-83-01260-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOREY, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction of misdemeanor theft. Appellant contends that (1) there was a fatal variance between the allegations in the information and the proof at trial, (2) the evidence was insufficient to prove intent to steal, (3) the prosecutor committed misconduct in making a sidebar comment, (4) the court erred in improperly forming the jury, and (5) appellant did not receive effective assistance of counsel. We disagree with each of these contentions and, consequently, affirm.

Appellant initially contends that there was a fatal variance between the allegations…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Esquivel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Woodard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  2. Daniel Mavero v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API