Floyd v. State

Boggs, Judge.

William Floyd appeals, contending in his sole enumeration of error that insufficient evidence supports his burglary conviction. We disagree and affirm.

When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence,

the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. This familiar standard gives full play to the responsibility of the trier of fact fairly to resolve conflicts in the testimony, to weigh the evidence, and to draw…