Legal Opinion

Williamsburg Independent People, Inc. v. Tierney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 24, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The court properly dismissed the petition seeking to compel respondent to present petitioner’s Request For Evaluation (RFE), since “there is no statutory requirement that [respondent] adhere to a particular procedure in determining whether to consider a property for designation” (Matter of Citizens Emergency Comm. to Preserve Preserv. v Tierney, 70 AD3d 576, 577 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 710 [2010]). Accordingly, the decision as to whether an RFE should be calendared is a discretionary action and thus mandamus to compel is not an available remedy. Moreover, contrary to petitioner’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Citizens Emergency Committee to Preserve Preservation v. TierneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Landmark West! v. BurdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Tribeca Trust, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API