Legal Opinion

Stewart v. DeNoon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 1908No. Appeal, No. 7PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 7, Oct. T., 1907, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., .March T., 1903, No. 435, on verdict for plaintiffs in case of W. L. Stewart and George W. Stewart, partners as Stewart Brothers, v. Isaac N. DeNoon and Joseph C. DeNoon, partners as DeNoon Brothers. Trespass to recover damages for loss of stock of goods. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $40,800. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned were (1-7) above instructions, quoting them.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Brown,

At the time the appellees sustained the loss which is the subject of this litigation they were wholesale boot and shoe dealers in the city of Pittsburg, and appellants were engaged in the wholesale paint and glass business. They occupied adjoining parts of a building, separated by a thin terra cotta partition. Appellees’ part was known as Fo. 917 Liberty street, and appellants’ as 919. The fire which caused the destruction of appellees’ goods occurred about one o’clock on the morning of July 29, 1902, and is alleged in the statement to have resulted from an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilkinson Manufacturing Co. v. WeldeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kehres v. StuempfleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Vautier v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Irwin v. Leuten Brick Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Perry v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Farmers Home Mutual Insurance v. Grand Forks Implement Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API