Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Minneapolis Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 15, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, Vanderburgh, J., presiding. cited Carpenter v. Leonard, 5 Minn. 119 (155.)

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The main question in this case, and the only one necessary to be considered, is, whether a mechanic’s lien, for labor and materials employed and used in the construction of a dry kiln for drying lumber, can be properly extended to a saw-mill and planing-mill, and the lots on which they stand, as being appurtenant to the latter.

The facts as found by the trial court, so far as they bear upon this question, are as follows: The Minneapolis Lumber Company were the owners of lots 1, 2 and 3, in block 30, of Bottineau’s addition to St. Anthony, and had erected thereon, and in operation, a saw-mill…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. North Platte Valley Irr. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  2. Fechet v. DrakeArizona Supreme Court · 1887
  3. S. H. Bowman Lumber Co. v. PiersolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API