Legal Opinion

Farr v. Morrill

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Esther Farr, as administratrix, etc., of Asa Farr, deceased, against Charles Morrill, to compel an accounting. Defendant appeals from judgment directing such accounting.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

This action was brought to compel an accounting upon the part of the defendant for the business done in the manufacture and sale of certain patented articles since the death of one Asa Farr, of whom the plaintiff had been appointed administratrix. The defendant denied the right, to an account, and the court below held that there was a copartnership between said Farr and thedefendant, and gave judgment for the accounting, and from such judgment this appeal is taken. The facts which it is necessary to-consider in the determination of this appeal seem to be undisputed, and they" are that in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hooley v. GieveNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Durant v. . PiersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. China & Japan Trading Co. v. ProvandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. People's National Bank v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Macauley v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API