Legal Opinion

Welch v. . Kingsland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Aiu?eal from an order made at Spring Term, 1883, of Haywood Superior Court, by Avery, J. The plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The parties to this action, which involved the proper location of the divisional line between their several tracts of land, at spring term, 1881, came to a compromise, and agreed that it should be established according to the calls of the deed from William Heaver to John Deaver, under which the plaintiff derives title, and be ascertained and fixed by a survey made by W. H. Hargrove, and that certain designated persons should assess the plaintiff’s damages. The terms of this agreement were embodied in a judgment, and orders were made by the court to give it effect.

At spring term, 1882, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Henderson v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Shinn v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  3. Miller v. . JusticeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Perry v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Russ v. WoodardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Murrill v. . MurrillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Branch v. Carolina Shoe Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API