Legal Opinion
Coones v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 1990No. 89-209PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
URBIGKIT, Justice.
The United States District Court for the District of Wyoming certified to this court the following three questions which arose during a bankruptcy case. The stated questions, which involve the statutory interpretation of Wyoming’s execution exemptions, are:
1. May a husband and wife each claim as exempt $2,000.00 of tools of trade under W.S. § l-20-106(b) (for a total of $4,000.00) when both are involved in the same occupation.’
2. May a rancher or farmer claim as exempt 75% of the proceeds derived from the sale of non-purchase money livestock under W.S. § 1-15-408.
3. May a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thomson v. Wyoming In-Stream Flow CommitteeWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- TERRY AND COMPANY v. HensenWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re SandersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1987
- In Re AnselmiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Wyoming · 1985
- Lingle State Bank of Lingle v. PodolakWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Coones v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Trudeau v. Royal (In Re Trudeau)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Royal v. Pancratz (In Re Pancratz)District Court, D. Wyoming · 1994
- In Re WeltyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Wyoming · 1998
- Friedt v. MoseankoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.