Pujals v. Columbia Graphophone Co.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the Court
Odlin, Judge,
delivered the following opinion:
There, are two grounds set forth by counsel for defendant in his motion to dismiss the bill. First, it is claimed that this court has no jurisdiction over the person of the defendant, a nonresident corporation, because the latter has no office and has no agent in a legal sense in Porto Pico, upon whom service of process could be made. This point has already been decided by this court and I am still of opinion that the peculiar cireum-*402stances of this case, keeping in view the letter written by the-defendant corporation, mentioning Gonzalez Padin…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ford v. Charles E. Blaney Amusement Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1906
- Falk v. Gast Lith. & Eng. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1889