Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 2, 1990No. 23704-7-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Swanson, J. —

Robert L. Smith appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Verne Thompson in a collection action on a promissory note. Smith contends that the trial court erred in permitting Thompson to recover a deficiency judgment after Thompson sold the property securing the note.

In April 1982, Thompson sold Smith a single-family residence for $58,000. Pursuant to the purchase and sales agreement, Smith borrowed $20,000 from private investors, who were secured by a first deed of trust. Smith then made a $15,000 down payment on the house and executed a $43,000 promissory note to Thompson,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Cox v. HeleniusWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Fluke Capital & Management Services Co. v. RichmondWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Donovick v. Seattle-First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gardner v. First Heritage BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Umpqua Bank v. Shasta Apartments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Cornerstone Homes & Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co, V Cornerstone Home & Dev LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Roger Gardner, App. v. First Heritage Bank, Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API