Legal Opinion

Samuel v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 22, 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Samuel was indicted and convicted of the murder of Jacob Carl Atnip, by shooting him with a pistol, in violation of §13A-6-2, Code of Alabama 1975. He was consequently sentenced to life imprisonment. Because Samuel does not contest the sufficiency of the evidence, a recitation of the facts surrounding the offense is not necessary.

Samuel argues on appeal that the trial court committed reversible error by allowing a witness to testify that, on the night of Mr. Atnip's murder, Samuel was seen in possession of $158 or $178. He predicates such error on the general rule that "the fact of a person's…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Thomas v. WareAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Lawrence v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Banner Welders, Inc. v. KnightonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. State v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Sheridan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  4. Holmes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Wiggins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API