Legal Opinion

George v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 4, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Pike Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

— Affirming.

The appellant, Pete George, upon his trial in the Pike circuit court under an indictment returned therein was convicted of the offense of illegally manufacturing spirituous, vinous and malt liquors.. His motion for a new trial was overruled and lie prosecutes this appeal relying for reversal principally upon the ground that the evidence of the Commonwealth was insufficient to sustain the conviction and that his motion for a peremptory instruction should have prevailed, although he makes numerous other complaints in his application for a new trial.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Wells v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API