Legal Opinion

Stamps v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided June 10, 1969No. FS-69-C-39PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAMS, District Judge.

This is a diversity action and defendant has filed a motion to dismiss for *546lack of the requisite jurisdictional amount. The plaintiff, Eda Stamps, and her husband, Gary Stamps, and their minor son, Randy Stamps, seek to recover from the defendant under either one or both of two insurance policies issued by the defendant, providing uninsured automobile or motorist coverage1 with limits in each policy of $10,000.00 for one person in each accident and $20,-000. 00 for two or more persons in each accident.

Eda Stamps, wife of Gary Stamps, and their son, Randy…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Troy Bank v. G. A. Whitehead & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Pinel v. PinelSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Robert E. Hedberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  4. Shields v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  5. Eagle Star Insurance Company, Limited v. Augustin Maltes, Gilberto Perez, and Bernabe ArroyoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Saval v. BL Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  2. Saval v. Bl Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API