United States v. McAfee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Rodger L. McAfee appeals from summary judgment in the Government’s foreclosure action against his property in El Nido, California. The district court found that the Government’s suit did not violate California’s “one action rule” and that McAfee was not entitled to equitable es-toppel or an offset for negligence. We affirm.
Facts
McAfee and his wife purchased 1480 acres of California farmland in 1976. In the following months, the area suffered severe drought and the strata under McAfee’s land shifted. The six wells on his property failed. To continue farming operations, McAfee…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sergeant Perry Watkins v. United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Clyde E. Williamson, D/B/A Triangle 44 Farms v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Blackburn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McAfee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003