Legal Opinion
Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Azar
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 26, 2019No. Civil Action No.: 18-776 (RC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge *103DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING DEFENDANTS' CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
I. INTRODUCTION
The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act ("ISDEAA"), 25 U.S.C. §§ 5301 - 5423, authorizes the federal government and Indian tribes to enter into contracts that permit the tribes to provide to their members federally funded services that the government would have otherwise provided itself. Pursuant to the ISDEAA, Plaintiff in this case, the Seminole Tribe of Florida, has for years contracted with the Secretary of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Thomas R. Sherwood v. The Washington PostCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. LeavittSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Muscogee (Creek) Nation, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe v. Donald Hodel, Secretary, U.S. Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation v. MnuchinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Cook Inlet Tribal Council, Inc. v. MandreganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Jamestown S'klallam Tribe v. AzarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. AzarDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. AzarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019