Legal Opinion

Hinkley v. Wabash Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1910No. Docket No. 56PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Lenawee; O’Mealey, J. Case by Ida B. Hinkley against the Wabash Railway Company for personal injuries. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

On the morning of February 17, 1907, the plaintiff and her mother started to go from their farm to the city of Adrian in a single buggy. The horse was driven by Mr. Stamp, who worked the farm. He sat upon a blanket rolled up, which was placed between the two women, so he was a little higher up than they were. The highway ran north and south and crossed the tracks of the Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad, and the defendant road, near Madison Center. The conveyance was going north. It passed over the track of the Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad, and the horse had passed the *547track of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hintz v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Wilbur v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Corbs v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lambert v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Nichols v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Cinadar v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Fillingham v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Tietz v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. of CanadaMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API