Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1986No. 9854; CR. NO. 7656PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

Claiming a denial of his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel at trial, Michael Smith appeals from a judgment of conviction of Attempted Sodomy in the Second Degree entered by the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit. 1 Because we are convinced from a review of the record that the performance of defense counsel was not within the range of competence expected of lawyers in criminal cases, we vacate the judgment and remand the case for retrial.

I

The defendant was charged with attempting to engage in deviate sexual conduct with a person…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. PickensMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. RichieHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. KelekolioHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Dan v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Briones v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API