W.T.J. v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
W.T.J. (“J.”) appeals the juvenile court’s denial of his motions 1) to set aside his plea agreement, and 2) for review of his sentence by the presiding judge.
We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for re-sentencing.
ISSUES
I. Whether the juvenile court erred in denying J.’s motion to set aside his plea agreement.
II. Whether the court erred in denying J.’s motion for review of his sentence by the presiding judge.
FACTS
In April 1997, J. was found to have committed an act that would be theft as a class D felony if committed by an adult. In late May…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- M.R. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Graham v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Scott-Gordon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- M.Y. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- P.G. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- N.D.F. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- N.D.F. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- DC v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- In the Interest of P.L.B.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- NDF v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.