Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Cozart

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 20, 1956No. 36301PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.

1. While it is true that a tenant cannot dispute the landlord’s title in a dispossessory proceeding, this relationship must be shown to exist before this rule applies. Griffeth v. Wilmore, 48 Ga. App. 96 (2) (166 S. E. 673). The plaintiff made an agreement with the defendant’s agent to accept a certain sum each month. The defendant insists that this was not rent, whereas the plaintiff contends that it was. Both parties did agree that the agreement was made “without prejudice.” The plaintiff testified, in regard to the agreement between him and the defendant’s attorney, that “without…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Garrick v. TidwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Griffeth v. WilmoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Watson v. ToliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Hunter v. StembridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  5. Henry v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. HeardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Roberts v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Young v. BeasleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  4. Martin v. HeardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. Martin v. HeardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API