Legal Opinion
Mulvihill v. Spalding Worldwide Sports, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 18, 2002No. CIV.A. 01-30045-MAPPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S BILL OF COSTS
(Docket No. 64)
PONSOR, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought an action for wrongful discharge against Spalding Sports Worldwide, Inc. (“Spalding”) and against his union Local for violation of the duty of fair representation under the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq. On October 16, 2002, the court allowed the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and directed the clerk to enter judgment for the defendants. The foundation for the court’s ruling was the failure of the record to support plaintiffs claim that he was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tommie Y. MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUGHES HELICOPTERS, INC., a DIVISION OF SUMMA CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- American Automobile Manufacturers Association v. Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Environmental ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- 29 Fair empl.prac.cas. 300, 29 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,937 National Organization for Women v. Bank of California, National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Paul N. Papas v. Margaret HanlonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Coulter v. Newmont Gold Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anunciacao v. Caterpillar Japan, Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Gregg v. Northeastern UniversityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024