Union National Bank v. Hunt
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. The bank is chargeable with fraudulent acts and representations done and made for the purpose of effecting the sale. —Bank v. Peck, 29 Conn. 384; Wannall v. Hem, 57 Mo. 478; Bank v. Gh'egg, 14 N. H. 331 ; Hatch v. Taylor, 10 N. H. 538. If representations of the character set forth in the answer were material, were false, were known to be false, and were made to induce the purchase, and relied on by the purchaser, they avoided the sale. —…
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. The bank is chargeable with fraudulent acts and representations done and made for the purpose of effecting the sale. —Bank v. Peck, 29 Conn. 384; Wannall v. Hem, 57 Mo. 478; Bank v. Gh'egg, 14 N. H. 331 ; Hatch v. Taylor, 10 N. H. 538. If representations of the character set forth in the answer were material, were false, were known to be false, and were made to induce the purchase, and relied on by the purchaser, they avoided the sale. — Broion v. North, 21 Mo. 528 ; Joliffe v. Collins, 21 Mo. 338 ; City Bank v. Phillips, 22 Mo. 85 ; Irving v. Thomas, 18…
1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.
This is an action on a promissory note made by the defendant Theodore Hunt and indorsed by Charles L. Hunt. There is an allegation that the indorser waived demand and notice. As to this the jury found for the indorser, and as to his liability nothing more need be said. The petition alleges that the defendant Theodore Hunt purchased of Aull & Pollard one hundred shares of stock in the bank of the corporation plaintiff, at eighty cents on the dollar, in consideration of which a note at four months for $8,000, made by Theodore and indorsed by Charles Hunt, was given to Aull & Pollard, and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fleckner v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Life & Fire Insurance v. Mechanic Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Silver Lake Bank v. NorthNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
- Rutland & Burlington Railroad v. ProctorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cass County v. Mercantile Town Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- City of Goodland v. Bank of DarlingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
- Bowman Dairy Co. v. MooneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- Merker v. CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Witt v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914