Legal Opinion

Westchester Park Associates v. Unmack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 26, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted, in accordance with the following memorandum: The exclusive remedy for judicial review of the amount of an assessment is a tax certiorari proceeding under Real Property Tax Law article 7 (Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v City School Dist., 59 NY2d 262, 268). Since plaintiff does not question defendants’ jurisdiction to tax, the court erred by concluding that plaintiff could collaterally attack the assessment in a plenary action by asserting equitable estoppel as a ground for relief (see, Samuels v Town of Clarkson, 91 AD2d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. La Porto v. Village of PhilmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. City School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Samuels v. Town of ClarksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Stabile v. Half Hollow Hills Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Wood v. CordelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rubin v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Town of Clay Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API