Westchester Park Associates v. Unmack
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted, in accordance with the following memorandum: The exclusive remedy for judicial review of the amount of an assessment is a tax certiorari proceeding under Real Property Tax Law article 7 (Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v City School Dist., 59 NY2d 262, 268). Since plaintiff does not question defendants’ jurisdiction to tax, the court erred by concluding that plaintiff could collaterally attack the assessment in a plenary action by asserting equitable estoppel as a ground for relief (see, Samuels v Town of Clarkson, 91 AD2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- La Porto v. Village of PhilmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. City School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Samuels v. Town of ClarksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Stabile v. Half Hollow Hills Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Wood v. CordelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rubin v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Town of Clay Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995