Legal Opinion

Baker v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1942PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

On. the stipulated facts there is no basis for holding that the insurance policy was in effect when Hyman D. Baker died. The right of the insured, after default in premium payment, to elect one of the options described in the policy, did not pass to his beneficiaries at his death. (Lange v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 278 N. Y. 626.) Mere proof that the policy bore a date two months earlier than its actual date of issue, and that insured paid premiums for that two-month period, did not establish such discrimination as was prohibited by section 89 of the Insurance Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 28) as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. . HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Lange v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kredietbank, N v. v. ESIC Capital Corp. (In Re Rosner)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  2. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. EilersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Zachary v. R. H. Macy & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Fenster v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Jones v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API