Legal Opinion

Penney v. Burns

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1935No. 8 Div. 643Published

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

This is an action on an- attachment bond for damages, principally attorney’s fees, for defending the attachment suit, which said attachment had been wrongfully sued out, for the reason that there was no debt owing the plaintiff by the defendant in said attachment suit.

These appellants, by various methods, attempted to confine the appellee’s right to recover the fees to service rendered in the defense of the attachment strictly as distinguished from the claim for indebtedness as set out in the complaint accompanying the attachment.

It has been often held that where there…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bolling v. TateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. McGraw v. LittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Smith v. SummersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Schuessler v. StillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API