Legal Opinion
Technology Innovation Center, Inc. v. Advanced Multiuser Technologies Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 30, 2000No. 1-99-0364PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson
This started out as a forcible entry and detainer case. It turned into a rancorous Supreme Court Rule 137 (134 Ill. 2d R. 137) sanctions proceeding that took on a life of its own. All in all, it has bounced around in our judicial system for more than seven years. Hopefully, with this opinion, we now put an end to it.
Advanced Multiuser Technologies (AMT), Carole Pickelsimer (Pickelsimer), and Douglas Cannon (Cannon) (collectively referred to as defendants) appeal from the trial court’s denial of their petition for sanctions brought pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 137 and their petition for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dowd & Dowd, Ltd. v. GleasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Estate of Wernick v. MacKsIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Yassin v. Certified Grocers of Illinois, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Fremarek v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Burrows v. PickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Benson v. StaffordAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Kensington's Wine Auctioneers & Brokers, Inc. v. John Hart Fine Wine, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Baker v. Daniel S. Berger, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Sadler v. CreekmurAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Webber v. Wight & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.