Harris v. Crescent Construction Corp.

KLEES, Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant in this action, Arthur Harris, appeals the dismissal of his suit on an exception of prescription.

He urges that “the trial court erred in rendering judgment without having a hearing at which plaintiff and his counsel were notified to appear” and that “the trial judge erred in not giving plaintiff time to amend as mandated by C.C.P. 934”.

The record in this matter reveals that a petition was filed on August 31, 1978, and exceptions to the petition were filed by defendants on January 10, 1979. After several settings of the exceptions and continuances, the matters…