Hurley v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ADKINS, Judge.
As former Chief Judge Orth has pointed out, “[i]t is ... clear that habeas corpus is a means of seeking relief from the refusal of a judge to admit a person to bail or from the judge’s determination requiring an allegedly excessive bail.” Washburn v. Sheriff, 16 Md.App. 611, 612, 298 A.2d 462 (1973). In the absence of any reported appellate decision in this State, it is not “clear” whether the habeas judge must accord a full de novo hearing as to those issues. That is the principal question in this case. It is brought to us via William Francis Hurley’s application for leave to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People ex rel. Rosenthal v. WolfsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Bigley v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Long v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Whiteley v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Lewis v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Droney v. DroneyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- State v. Brookman State v. CarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- (2007), Maryland Attorney General Reports2007