Hardy v. Carolina Central Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Negligenee — Liability of Master. PETITION to rehear, by the defendant. (See 74 N. C. 734.) The petition was heard at June Term, 1876, and the opinion -delivered, but not heretofore reported.
1Opinion of the CourtReade, J.
We rehear the case upon the ground, that the ■defendant’s counsel, by reason of what he understood to be an intimation from the Court in his favor upon the question of the liability of a master to a servant for the negligence of a fellow servant, did not present his views as fully as he otherwise would have done. But'we are surprised that the learned counsel did not discover from the opinion filed, that we stated that and all his other points, and referred to his ■ full brief and stated that we had fully considered them; .■and that, conceding for the sake of the argument, all his positions to…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Conley v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Johnson v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Garrahy v. Kansas City, St. J. & C. B. R. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1885