Legal Opinion

Ex parte Milburn

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 15, 1835PublishedCited by 2 opinions

A RULE tó show cause why a habeas, corpus should not be awarded to bring up the body of George'' Milburn, in confinement in the jáil of the-county of Washington in the District of Columbia.

Read the full summary

A RULE tó show cause why a habeas, corpus should not be awarded to bring up the body of George'' Milburn, in confinement in the jáil of the-county of Washington in the District of Columbia. (a), The case, as stated in the opinion of / the court, was as follows; „ “ This is an application to the court by petition for a writ of habeas corpus to bring up the body> of George Milburn, now imprisoned in the jail of Washington county in the District of Columbia, upon a bench wafrant issued against him by .the circuit court of this district, to arrest him to answer to an in- ■ dictmeni now pending…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr Justice Story,

after stating the facts of the case, delivered the opinion cf the Court. .

The points principally relied on at the argument are, in the first place, that the party is not liable .to be arrested to answer the indictment, after having given a recognizance of bail; *710although the recognizance has been forfeited, and the party has not appeared and answered, and been tried on the indlament : in the next place, that the discharge upon the habeas corpus before Mr Chief Justice Cranch, is a bar to any subsequent arrest.

We are of opinion that neither of these grounds can, in point of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte George MilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  2. State v. FurgalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API