Legal Opinion

Januschke v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 29, 1967No. Docket No. 2056-65Published

Held, petitioner is not liable as a transferee of assets of Norma Nathan for an unpaid deficiency in income tax, due for the year 1952, plus an addition to the tax pursuant to sec. 293(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, and interest as provided by law.

1Opinion of the Court

Elsie Januschke, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Januschke v. Commissioner

Docket No. 2056-65

United States Tax Court

48 T.C. 496; 1967 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 75;

June 29, 1967, Filed

Decision will be entered for the petitioner.

Held, petitioner is not liable as a transferee of assets of Norma Nathan for an unpaid deficiency in income tax, due for the year 1952, plus an addition to the tax pursuant to sec. 293(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, and interest as provided by law.

Robert S. Raum, for the petitioner.

William F. Chapman, for the respondent.

Arundell, Judge.

ARUNDEL…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hennen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  2. United States v. Clarence J. PrinceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  3. Carroro v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  4. Januschke v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  5. Newman & Carey Subway Constr. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API