Legal Opinion

In re Heintz ex rel. Trembly

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1959No. File No. 9788PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanson, P. J.

In this habeas corpus proceeding Emmaline Trembly Heintz of Mooresville, Indiana, seeks custody of her minor daughter, Ruth Trembly. Mrs. Heintz alleges the child is being illegally detained in the custody of the child’s father, Wilbert B. Trembly, in Potter County. After a hearing the trial court entered its order recognizing and enforcing the terms of an Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Belmont County, Ohio, dated June 27, 1956, according to which applicant is entitled to the present custody of the child. The respondent father appeals.

Mrs. Heintz further alleged in her application that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Kovacs v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Matthews v. MatthewsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Application of HabeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Sweeney v. JonesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. LunaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hershey v. HersheySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Arbach v. GrubaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Matter of Estate of DonahueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Wooster v. WoosterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API