Legal Opinion

Baisdrenghien v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1914No. 18,632PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Cherokee district court; Edward E. Sapp, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This action was brought to recover damages for injuries received from a falling rock in a coal mine. By stipulation made before the trial, it was agreed that the appellee’s action should be limited to the alleged violation of the statutory obligations of appellant, and to further that purpose a portion of the amended petition should be stricken out.

A jury trial was had, special findings of fact made, and a general verdict returned in favor of appellee for $1000. The motion of appellant for a new trial was overruled. The principal defense on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Salina v. TrosperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Union Street Railway Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. ChanceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  4. Cheek v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Barrett v. DessySupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maurizi v. Western Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Hogan v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. López v. American Railroad Co. of Porto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936
  4. Albin v. MunsellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Merando v. AT & SF RLY. CO.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API