Legal Opinion

In Re the Complaint of K.S. Line Corp.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided September 24, 1984No. A83-477 CivPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VON DER HEYDT, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the issue whether the size of the limitation of liability fund should be controlled by United States or Korean law. This court held an initial hearing on the issue October 21, 1983. At that time, petitioner established to the court’s satisfaction that Korean limitation of liability law should control the size of the fund. Nevertheless, because the hearing was held on shortened time, the court granted claimants additional time to submit evidence and brief the issue.

This limitation action arises out of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Hellenic Lines Ltd. v. RhoditisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Black Diamond Steamship Corp. v. Robert Stewart & Sons, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cliffs-Neddrill Turnkey International-Oranjestad v. M/T Rich DukeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1990
  2. In Re Korea Shipping Corp., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Korea Shipping Corp. v. Tokio Marine & Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API