Legal Opinion
Caddell Const. Co., Inc. v. Lehman
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided January 2, 1985No. Civ. A. 284-223PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALAIMO, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is the Government’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Government asserts that exclusive jurisdiction as to plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief is vested in the United States Claims Court pursuant to § 133(a)(3) of the Federal Courts Improvement Act (“FCIA”) of 1982, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(3) (1982 & Supp. II1984). After an exhaustive review of the relevant case precedent and legislative history, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be sustained.
BACKGROUND
On September 21, 1984, the United States Navy issued…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Caddell Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- A.R.E. Manufacturing Co. v. United States (In re A.R.E. Manufacturing Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1992
- J.P. Francis & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Metric Systems Corp. v. US Dept. of Air ForceDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1987
- In Re ARE Mfg. Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.