Legal Opinion

Tartakin v. Stitt

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 4, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

This suit in equity is to establish a debt against “any or either” of the defendants Stitt and Hunton, and to reach and apply property belonging to either of them. The report of the master was confirmed, and a final decree was entered declaring that the defendant Stitt was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $4,330.83 and dismissing the bill as to the other defendants. The plaintiff appealed.

The defendant Hunton was the owner of the equity in a tract of land on Thorndike Street, Brookline, the record title to which was in the name of her father, the defendant Stitt. On this property there…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Herman v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Unity Mutual Life Assurance Ass'n v. DuganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Hewins v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goldman v. MosesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Chartrand v. ChartrandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Maynard v. FabyanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Abbruzise v. SposataMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API