Legal Opinion

House of Seagram, Inc. v. Assam Drug Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1968No. File 10402PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENTTO, Judge.

Plaintiff is the manufacturer and exclusive distributor to a wholesaler located in South Dakota of certain alcoholic beverages which bear its trademark, brand or name. Such wholesaler sells directly to the defendants and to other retailers in the state. Plaintiff entered into contractual arrangements with various South Dakota retailers as authorized under our Fair Trade Law, SDC Ch. 54.04, which agreements provided minimum retail resale prices below which retailers may not sell plaintiff's products.

Defendants were not parties to such contracts, but knew that plaintiff had…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fashion Originators' Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Owl Drug Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Bristol-Myers Co. v. PickerNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Owens v. City of BeresfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Aberdeen Ed. Ass'n v. Aberdeen Bd. of Ed., Ind. Sch. D.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Fries v. Wessington School District No. 2-4South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Adrian v. McKinnieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Canton Lutheran Church v. Sovik, Mathre, Sathrum & QuanbeckDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API